Using dApps require gas fees which we can simpy do with peer to peer like torrent services. And we require lotta computer resources for storing the info within our and other computers in the networks and multiple networks with the blockchain architecture which just increases!
Share
First of all, there are different categories of DAPPs leveling on different blockchains and different layer solutions.
Peer to peer based DAPPs that allow interchange of funds,tokens or other information are one of those types.
Another thing we must understand is that μTorrent and platforms like PirateBay had already been using decentralized servers before the advent of present day blokchains as they did this in late 90s.
So what new has been added now that only Decentralized Apps can solve?
Firstly, the problem of (PoW). Any asset fundamentally is based upon trust. The monetarily value of anything comes from trust and security. Fiat currency is secured by advanced Bonds, Securities and other militial contracts.
Similarly, to provide value to the decentralized units of currency, Proof Of Work is an effective mechanism that basically is a long competition between smart contracts to solve a cryptographic puzzle first. On the basis of this “mining” is done.
This requires a combination of packages and architecture at different layers with millions of nodes interacting altogether.
This alone cannot be solved by peer to peer networks.
Secondly, Staking Pools and Yield Farms and Liquidity Pools are other DAPPs that require more architectural packages and APIs other than peer-peer network. There must be Layers and webpacks with a lot of combined dynamic stacks over a Blockchain to run it in efficient amount of time.
The advent of Ethereum 2.0 recently has significantly decreased the runtime and processing by 100th fraction while staking via PoS because of L-1 and L-2 additions over it which has been done by further additions over existing reinforcements.
A peer to peer network is not feasible for larger scalability of stacks and layers of solutions over any decentralized networks
The entire idea of solutions like Ethereum, Arbitrum and Fantom is to reduce dependency over peer to peer networks and build more solutions and dApps over the Blockchain themselves.
With Sharding Tools, Arbitrage By Time Stakers and Insurance Mining, the peer-peer network itself is not sufficient enough as these decentralized solutions require more packages and segmenting APIs to handle them. This has created the advent of entirely new marketplace of Web 3.0 solely focusing on further developments of such protocols and packages that can reduce the cost and time gap burnout .
In short, basic Decentralized Applications that solely focus on information exchange can be based over peer-peer network but the present day need of Web 3.0 arch requires more protocols and solutions to increase efficiency and decrease burnout cost/fees.
Help me if I am wrong, so basically you’re saying for the web 3.0 we are all talking about, the efficiency and cost fees would be more feasible within the reach of the blockchain architectures like Ethereum rather than mere peer-to-peer.
Meaning, we just need to realize the capacity to which we will be using the product. So for the small information sharing is much preferred in peer-to-peer network but when we are going big, the blockchain tech is here to make that whole lot easier and efficient.
Thank you for the insight!
Yes thats exactly what this means!